BOXING 4 FREE's video: A look back at Manny Pacquiao versus Ricky Hatton

On May 2nd, 2009, Manny Pacquiao fought Ricky Hatton for his IBO Super Lightweight title. Hatton also had The Ring Magazine Junior Welterweight title at the time. In this video, BOXING 4 FREE podcaster, Andrew Schweitzer, looks back at the build up and the fight itself. BOXING 4 FREE does not own any of the footage in this video. Sources below. Sources: Footage: Manny Pacquiao vs. Ricky Hatton courtesy of HBO. Footage: Floyd Mayweather vs. Ricky Hatton courtesy of HBO. Footage: Kosta Tsyzu vs. Ricky Hatton courtesy of Sky Sports. Footage: Ricky Hatton vs. Paulie Malignaggi courtesy of HBO. Footage: Pacquiao vs. Hatton: 24/7 courtesy of HBO. Footage: Hatton & Pacquiao playing darts courtesy of Manchester Evening News https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPFSLlkwCqpy23jwYDwAPrg Photo: Ricky Hatton vs. Jose Castillo - courtesy of Mark Robinson. Article: "Hatton promises he can triumph in power game" by Tom Bryant https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/mar/31/ricky-hatton-manny-pacquaio-fight-boxing Article: "Manny Pacquiao and Ricky Hatton superfight 'off' as Filipino refuses deal" by Gareth A Davies https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/boxing/4305509/Manny-Pacquiao-and-Ricky-Hatton-superfight-off-as-Filipino-refuses-deal.html Article: "Hatton, Pacquiao headed for May 2 bout" by Dan Rafael http://www.espn.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=3854403 Article: "Mayweather Jr. to fight again" by Dan Rafael http://www.espn.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=4125184 Ricky Hatton's boxing record courtesy of BoxRec http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/9314 Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Additionally, the fair use defense to copyright infringement was codified for the first time in section 107 of the 1976 Act. Fair use was not a novel proposition in 1976, however, as federal courts had been using a common law form of the doctrine since the 1840s (an English version of fair use appeared much earlier). The Act codified this common law doctrine with little modification. Under section 107, the fair use of a copyrighted work is not copyright infringement, even if such use technically violates section 106. While fair use explicitly applies to use of copyrighted work for criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research purposes, the defense is not limited to these areas. The Act gives four factors to be considered to determine whether a particular use is a fair use: the purpose and character of the use (commercial or educational, trans-formative or reproductive, political); the nature of the copyrighted work (fictional or factual, the degree of creativity); the amount and substantiality of the portion of the original work used; and the effect of the use upon the market (or potential market) for the original work.