×

Nati's video: Iji - Iosa Boss Fight No Damage Extreme

@Iji - Iosa Boss Fight (No Damage) (Extreme)
Now THIS is what I call a boss fight - simple, challenging and fun. It's random sure, but at least she doesn't spam very hard to predict attacks every single second and doesn't scatter ten million rockets all over the room, unlike a certain flying core boss. Unfortunately, after I beat Iosa's 1st phase, I died on the 2nd one. There's a checkpoint when you get to her 2nd phase, and since I couldn't reset the fight to start me at phase one again, I edited the transition between phase one and two and cut to the attempt where I beat Iosa's 2nd phase. Sorry about that, I myself don't like heavily editing these no damage videos like this, but there's no way in hell am I gonna go through the entire sector 9 with just 2 HP again just so I can get another try at beating all of Iosa's phases in one segment. I love Iji, but I'm not THAT much of a fanboy. Welcome to my No Damage run of Iji. In this run, I beat the whole game on Extreme difficulty without taking any health damage at all. Taking shield damage doesn't count, because not only is it ridiculously hard to avoid taking shield damage, it's also legit impossible to avoid getting hit at times, especially during boss fights. Link to the full playlist of the run - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfoR4xzatxjUbGiOjj4Bb1LrgORrFoGjt Go play Iji it's a great game - http://www.remar.se/daniel/iji.php Iji Subreddit (yes there actually is one): https://new.reddit.com/r/iji/

6

2
Nati
Subscribers
307
Total Post
62
Total Views
228.2K
Avg. Views
4.6K
View Profile
This video was published on 2019-01-03 00:51:13 GMT by @Nati on Youtube. Nati has total 307 subscribers on Youtube and has a total of 62 video.This video has received 6 Likes which are lower than the average likes that Nati gets . @Nati receives an average views of 4.6K per video on Youtube.This video has received 2 comments which are lower than the average comments that Nati gets . Overall the views for this video was lower than the average for the profile.

Other post by @Nati