Perfect BReatHer's video: E mc Described by the theoretical physicist Albert Einstein

Mirror Source: UAP Channel / fun with Narratives! https://www.youtube.com/c/UAPChannel. Underrated Actual Physicist UAP scanning the scene of science, history, sociology to unravel what’s vindicating the Bible’s accuracy and precision with uncommonly good sense, humor, great music, moxie, and flair. https://www.youtube.com/c/UAPch. Mass–energy equivalence In physics, mass-energy equivalence is the relationship between mass and energy in a system’s rest frame, where the two values differ only by a constant and the units of measurement. The principle is described by Albert Einstein's famous formula: E=mc² —In SI units, the energy E is measured in Joules, the mass m is measured in kilograms, and the speed of light is measured in meters per second. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Walton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cockcroft. "The equivalence of mass and energy was originally expressed by the equation m = L/c², which easily translates into the far more well-known E = mc² in Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content? published in the Annalen der Physik (27 September 1905) : "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c²." In a later statement explaining the ideas expressed by this equation, Einstein summarized: "It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind. Furthermore, the equation E = mc², in which energy is put equal to mass, multiplied by the square of the velocity of light, showed that very small amounts of mass may be converted into a very large amount of energy and vice versa. The mass and energy were in fact equivalent, according to the formula mentioned before. This was demonstrated by Cockcroft and Walton in 1932, experimentally." Atomic Physics (1948) by the J. Arthur Rank Organisation , Ltd. The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? ("Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?") Annalen der Physik 18, 639-641 (1905). Quoted in Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics by Max Jammer (1961) We shall, therefore, assume the complete physical equivalence of a gravitational field and a corresponding acceleration of the reference system. Statement of the equivalence principle in Yearbook of Radioactivity and Electronics (1907) The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things easily achieve such authority over us that we forget their earthly origins and accept them as unalterable givens. Blind obedience to authority is the greatest enemy of truth. The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny, however, is alleviated by their lack of consistency. Therefore it is by no means an idle game if we become practiced in analysing long-held commonplace concepts and showing the circumstances on which their justification and usefulness depend, and how they have grown up, individually, out of the givens of experience. Thus their excessive authority will be broken. Obituary for physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach In the temple of science are many mansions, and various indeed are they that dwell therein and the motives that have led them thither. The state of mind which enables a man to do work of this kind is akin to that of the religious worshiper or the lover; the daily effort comes from no deliberate intention or program, but straight from the heart. I have second thoughts. Maybe God is malicious. In science, moreover, the work of the individual is so bound up with that of his scientific predecessors and contemporaries that it appears almost as an impersonal product of his generation. [I do not] carry such information in my mind since it is readily available in books. ...The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think. In so far as theories of mathematics speak about reality, they are not certain, and in so far as they are certain, they do not speak about reality. Whether you can observe a thing or not depends on the theory which you use. It is the theory which decides what can be observed. Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discernible concatenations, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion. To that extent I am, in point of fact, religious. Science is international but its success is based on institutions, which are owned by nations. If therefore, we wish to promote culture we have to combine and to organize institutions with our own power and means. Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not". -Albert Einstein –Energy =mc² =mc2