Parmenides of YouTubes's video: Why Division Disalienation of Pan-Africanism Socialism Part 3 Catch 22 of Movement Building

In this video the following related contradictions will be discussed: *In the video there were a couple of errors that I forgot to fix from the original list document. I type very sloppily, and a lot of time spelling checks on certain document software will not care for the sentence but only the word. Such as where it says 'dominate' instead of 'dominant' society - small error as it works either way; but that is corrected below. Contradictions that exist (catch-22): 1) No money, wealth, or resources for building, which is controlled by white supremacy/capital. And, getting access either through own activity or through others is dependent upon adherence to the dominant society. (note: post: most movements are set up as controlled opposition from the jump; actual strategy would not be, then, to not work with white people in a coalition, but you make it dependent on them joining what is right and coming to your side) 2) Because of that, most people who are revolutionary, have less access to resources, are less educated, etc. They are more revolutionary, both, because they lack resources, while also lacking resources because they are revolutionary. Goes back to 1. 3) Thus, you don’t get many people prominent, especially today, who have access even to social media or large audiences/followings, that also have that proximity to revolutionary potential. 4) Within this, also, most people who are more educated and have more complete ideological development and information, generally, don’t make great leaders, are less popular, tend to be more nerdy and lame, less charismatic, less funny/sense of humor/awkward, etc. 5) Also, most people are not attracted to information, as much as a sense of identification, group inclusion, motivational speak, platitudes, or things to boost energy/enthusiasm, which pure, boring, informational content, inherently lacks. 6) So, it is almost an impossibility to get all of those things working within one individual. And, even in the very rare cases where you come close, it doesn’t tend to last, while the major contradictions still exist: Fred Hampton, 2Pac, George Jackson, etc. 7) Because of the ideological frameworks tied to political-economic, social, etc., frameworks of dominate society, and the access to resources, social status, class status, etc., being tied to that, on the other side, those with access tend to have an ideology that favors or is more in line with the dominate society, e.g., university education, PMC, petit-bourgeois. This series will critically discuss the various pan-African and socialist political movements and ideologies. I'll start with introductory breakdowns over the first three parts. Then, I should be able to analyze the various ideologies, focusing on individual representatives who have those ideas. I'll likely start with Adolph Reed, Frank Wilderson, and Gerald Horne, then move on to others.