×

Quimbee's video: Russell v Place Case Brief Summary Law Case Explained

@Russell v. Place Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Russell v. Place | 94 U.S. (4 Otto) 606 (1876) Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, is a tool that allows judges to efficiently dispose of factual and legal issues that were already litigated and central to a prior decision. Estoppel helps avoid repetitive lawsuits, sustain judicial resources, and maintain consistent judgments. However, for estoppel to achieve its purposes, the judge must be able to tell which issues were decided. In Russell versus Place, a patent decision left the Court befuddled. Nathan Russell received a patent for two processes of leather preparation. The first process involved using liquid fat, and the second process involved a method of treating certain lamb- and sheepskin with a compound. Russell lost the patent because the application’s description was declared defective. However, the patent was reissued after Russell amended the description. Russell sued Isaac Place and others for patent infringement in the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York, alleging that Place was selling Russell’s patented invention without permission. Place argued that the reissued patent was invalid because the new description changed the invention, and the leather preparations at issue had been in use for over two years prior to Russell’s application. A jury ruled in Russell’s favor, finding that the patent was valid and infringed. However, the record didn’t indicate which of Russell’s two leather-preparation processes had been infringed. Russell then brought a second action in the circuit court against Place for infringement of the same patent, arguing that the prior judgment estopped Place from asserting that the patent was invalid. This time, the circuit court found for Place. Russell appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted cert. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/russell-v-place The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/russell-v-place Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/ Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom

1

0
Quimbee
Subscribers
19K
Total Post
3.1K
Total Views
211
Avg. Views
17.6
View Profile
This video was published on 2021-03-06 01:30:01 GMT by @Quimbee on Youtube. Quimbee has total 19K subscribers on Youtube and has a total of 3.1K video.This video has received 1 Likes which are lower than the average likes that Quimbee gets . @Quimbee receives an average views of 17.6 per video on Youtube.This video has received 0 comments which are lower than the average comments that Quimbee gets . Overall the views for this video was lower than the average for the profile.Quimbee #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries has been used frequently in this Post.

Other post by @Quimbee