StopNATOcrimes's video: NATO State Organized Chemical Attack In Syria As Pretext For Eradication Of Independent State

False flags are an integral part of covert NATO military-intelligence ops: ” a deliberate gross distortion(s) of the truth used especially as a propaganda tactic.” Official stories are false. They’re contrary to reality. They turn truth on its head. They point fingers the wrong way. They’re pretexts for militarism, wars, mass killing and destruction, occupations, domestic repression, and other extremist national security state measures. Syrian insurgents used chemical weapons numerous times before. Clear evidence proves it. Media scoundrels suppressed it. They substituted lies for truth. They do it every time. It’s standard practice. On August 23, 2013 Russia Today headlined “Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack prepared before incident – Russia.” According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich: We’re getting more new evidence that this criminal act was of a provocative nature.” “In particular, there are reports circulating on the Internet, in particular that the materials of the incident and accusations against government troops had been posted for several hours before the so-called attack. Thus, it was a pre-planned action.” Assad demonstrated a “constructive approach.” He did so by letting UN experts investigate sites of previous chemical weapon attacks. On August 22, 2013 State Department spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said Syria crossed Obama’s red line. Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu declared “all red lines” crossed. He urged direct action. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said “we need a reaction by the international community.” He urged military force. Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said: “Early in the morning of August 21, a homemade missile with a so far unknown chemical poison gas was shot in the direction of this district from the positions of the militants.” “It was similar to the missile used by terrorists on March 19, this year, in Khan al-Asal (near Aleppo).” All-Russia Center of Disaster Medicine Professor Gennady Prostakishin said: “I don’t know, whether there is sarin in Syria, or not. Remember, what happened to Saddam Hussein.” “Americans voiced complaints against him concerning sarin and other toxic agents, too. But there was nothing there. The same thing is likely to be happening here.” The opposition has nothing to lose. It cannot win, and it does all it can to force the West to intervene in the conflict, to convince the West that the regime is ‘bloody and inhuman. Following chemical attack incidents, “TV channels financed by” opposition supporters automatically blame Assad. “It has all happened before. As soon as America has declared that it would intervene in case chemical weapons were found in Syria, Qatari(-controlled) al-Jazeera channel announced that it had already found it.” “As soon as the group of UN experts arrived in Syria in order to examine the data about chemical weapons, (Saudi Arabia’s) Al Arabiya channel immediately reported that it had been used by the government troops. This is a very rough work.” Throughout nearly five years of conflict, NATO backed insurgents committed numerous atrocities. They were caught red-handed many times. Assad was wrongfully blamed. The forces driving NATO interventions are naked geo-strategic interests in establishing hegemony over the world’s key sources of energy and pipeline routes linking them to the world market. The ruling class—first and foremost, the US financial aristocracy—is planning an intensification of militarist violence. These tendencies find direct expression in the corporate media’s insistent drumbeat for an escalation of the Syrian war. Nowhere is this war propaganda more prevalent or more hypocritical than in CNN and in the pages of the supposed liberal “newspaper of record,” the New York Times. Leading the pack are Roger Cohen and fellow Times columnist Thomas Friedman, who also led the propaganda charge for the war on Iraq. The logic of the drive to escalate the Syrian war was further spelled out Wednesday in a Washington Post editorial. Pointing to the alleged Russian buildup in Syria, it states, “Mr. Putin is acknowledging a truth that Mr. Obama has refused to accept: Any political agenda for Syria’s future is meaningless unless it is backed by power on the ground… If Mr. Obama wishes to see the US vision for Syria prevail over Russia’s, it will take more than phone calls.” The warning could not be clearer or more chilling. Behind the backs of the American people, powerful elements within the American ruling class and the state apparatus, with the collaboration of their media hacks, are preparing a military intervention that poses direct confrontation between the US and Russia, the world’s two principal nuclear powers.