The Radical Black Conservative's video: Choosing Welfare vs Husbands

Join my page :) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC522O1rf613xJXfcwOzFvFg/join Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/m/TheRadicalBlackConservative CashApp: 4IreneYvette Paypal: paypal.me/IreneYvette TheRadicalBlackConservative.com TheRadicalBlackConservative@gmail.com ------ XyayX Institute (For Black Youth): Enroll - https://www.thexyayxinstitute.org/enrollnow DONATE to XyayX: https://www.gofundme.com/f/TheXyayXInstitute Sources: https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/ces/ces5.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/309/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/471/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/400/309/ Other Sources: Bell, W. (1965). Aid to Dependent Children. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Davis, M.F. (1993). Brutal need: Lawyers and the Welfare Rights Movement, 1960-1973. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Forbath, W. (2001). The Constitution and the obligations of government to secure the material preconditions for a good society.” Fordham Law Review: 69, 1821. Gordon, L. (1994). Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare. New York, NY: The Free Press. Katz, M.B. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York, NY: Pantheon. Kornbluh, F. (1998). The goals of the national Welfare Rights Movement: Why we need them thirty years later. Feminist Studies, 24, 65. Michaelman, F.I. (1969). The Supreme Court 1968 term foreword: On protecting the poor through the Fourteenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 83, 7. Mink, G. (1998). Welfare’s end. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Reich, C.A. (1964). The new property. Yale Law Journal, 73, 733. West, G. (1981). The national Welfare Rights Movement: The social protest of poor women. New York, NY: Praeger. Other Court Cases: Rosas v. McMahon, 945 F.2d 1469 (1991) Van Lare v. Hurley, 421 U.S. 338 (1975) Lascaris v. Shirley, 420 U.S. 730 (1975) Burns v. Alcala,420 U.S. 575 (1975) Shea v. Vialpando, 416 U.S. 251 (1974) Ortwein v. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973) Carleson v. Remillard, 406 U.S. 598 (1972) Jefferson v. Hackney, 406 U.S. 535 (1972) Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) Townsend v. Swank, 404 U.S. 282 (1971) Goldberg v. Kelley, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) Lewis v. Martin, 397 U.S. 552 (1970) Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 (1970) Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) Rothstein v. Wyman, 303 F. Supp 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1969) King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 (1968) Fair Use NOTICE --- This video may contain copyrighted material for the purpose of criticism and teaching ---- Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Fair Use Definition Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test. 00:00 Intro 06:00 The Patriarchy 13:00 Welfare vs Orphanages 17:14 Lawsuits 4 Peen 29:22 Living Off Da System 38:07 Home Invasions 47:30 Do U Know HER 57:10 Risking it ALL 1:05:18 Conclusion