ThinkFeelExist's video: Brainwashing children for the New Society -- Alan Watt

To add to Alan's points, I'll add a few words about Julian Huxley and his book, “UNESCO: It's Purpose and it's Philosophy” (1947), the book Alan mentions. Sir Julian Huxley was the founder of UNESCO and, as such, its main ideologue, and the creator of global education – he was the man who defined the general aspects of what children the world over have been learning for the last 60 years or so. Huxley was one of the leaders of the Anglo-Venetian oligarchy in his day and, as such, a social architect and planner, working on geopolitical designs his better known brother Aldous Huxley could only portray in a semi-fictional form in works such as “Brave New World”. He was a neomalthusian and he therefore tended to believe, and advocate, that most human life (mostly that of the non-aristocratic type) is bad, for society and nature alike. As such, he was a relentless proponent of eugenics, social darwinism and totalitarian regime, as in his “Man in the Modern World”, published in the post-World War II years(!), in 1952. He was, indeed, one of the main leaders of the British Eugenics Society, the main institutional engine for eugenics and racial hygiene in the pre and post-war worlds. He also presided over the British Humanist Association, and he was Secretary for the Zoological Society of London. He was one of the founders of the modern conservation movement, which he and his ilk meant as a movement to enforce undervelopment and backwardness, territorial sequestration and neocolonial rule in the underdeveloped regions of the world – under the pretense of environmental conservation. It was during this time he helped institute the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) From his “UNESCO: It's Purpose and it's Philosophy” (1947): «[The task of UNESCO] is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species» p. 61 «There are instances of biological inequality which are so gross that they cannot be reconciled at all with the principle of equal opportunity. Thus low-grade mental defectives cannot be offered equality of educational opportunity, nor are the insane equal with the sane before the law or in respect of most freedoms. However, the full implications of the fact of human inequality have not often been drawn and certainly need to be brought out here, as they are very relevant to Unesco’s task [page 18]... whereas variety is in itself desirable, the existence of weaklings, fools, and moral deficients cannot but be bad. It is also much harder to reconcile politically with the current democratic doctrine of equality. In face of it, indeed, the principle of equality of opportunity must be amended to read “equality of opportunity within the limits of aptitude”... Again, many people are not intelligent or not scrupulous enough to be entrusted with political responsibility – a fact which unfortunately does not prevent quite a number of them from attaining it... To adjust the principle of democratic equality to the fact of biological inequality is a major task for the world, and one which will grow increasingly more urgent as we make progress towards realising equality of opportunity. To promote this adjustment, a great deal of education of the general public will be needed as well as much new research; and in both these tasks Unesco can and should co-operate» p. 20, 21 «At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilisation is dysgenic instead of eugenic; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable» p. 21