TrumanHW's video: POLITICAL BIAS in Google s search results that doesn t exist on DuckDuckGo

If you're ever searching for: pictures of couples, criminal statistics, information about IQ results or the status of psychometric data, statistics of CEOs, or for eff's sake, political content that reflects poorly on anyone on the Left ... you MUST be cognizant that while I doubt Google takes any top-down-hierarchical approach to 'grooming' their search results ... they appear to use no countermeasures to mitigate the influence of their homogeneous employment-roster personally tipping the scales of said results. I will try to make videos which show the examples and sort them in a series dedicated to biases within those .org and .com's which sculpt our perception of reality. This includes Wikipedia, Google, Youtube, NIH, and of COURSE, the media. If anyone would be willing to assist me in this project I would be MORE than grateful. I realize this is very brief, and perhaps were it only this example, could easily be dismissed as my own confirmation bias. But it is how predictable it is that using DuckDuckGo.com remedies the search results problem I'm experiencing ... and this occurs substantially more than 90% of the time -- which is beyond being "statistically significant." When using Wikipedia, I HIGHLY recommend looking at the "talk page" ... and reviewing WHO was assigned the project and the kind of information throughout the history of the phrases development within wikipedia which were rejected -- and for what reason. Thank you all, and good luck. This is a fight for the future of the United States and even the world to some extent.