Wicked Felina's video: Which Ending Is Mark s Unpacking The GREAT Mystery Scholars Cannot Let Go A Scholarly Deep Dive

@🌺The oldest manuscript of Mark ends with verse 8 and NO MORE. Unpacking the TRUE mystery baffling Bible Scholars for nearly 2,000 yrs. Is the LONGER ending original? An analysis of the different apologetic takes, from Catholic, to contradictory Catholic, to several protestant/evangelical takes ~ which branch of Christianity REALLY has got it RIGHT? 🌺 🌺EMAIL ADDRESS TO RECEIVE ~FREE~Holy Oil of YHVH as described in Exodus 🌺~ felinadelparadiso@gmail.com Twitter/X ~ Felina @FelinaOfficial ~ Or, just click on the icon for Twitter/X in the lower right hand corner of my channel page and send me a Direct Message ~ If you DO NOT receive a reply from me soon after sending me a message PLEASE send it again!🌺 🌺LINKS 🌺 ~ A Case against the Longer Ending of Mark An argument that Mark 16:9–20 is not original and so not inspired Scripture peter m. head https://textandcanon.org/a-case-against-the-longer-ending-of-mark/ LINKS ~ https://ehrmanblog.org/the-ending-of-mark-in-the-king-james-bible/ https://textandcanon.org/a-case-against-the-longer-ending-of-mark/ https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/a-fake-resurrection-in-marks-gospel https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/4-things-we-learn-from-jesus-parable-of-the-sheep-and-the-goats.html https://www.catholic.com/qa/marks-resurrection-account https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2020/10/video-lecture-mark-169-20-shorter.html https://nelson.ink/which-ending-of-marks-gospel-is-correct/ https://www.taylor.edu/news/letting-your-left-hand-know-what-your-right-hand-is-doing https://www.openbible.info/topics/why_do_u_call_me_lord_but_do_not https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2025%3A36-40&version=ESV 🌺CHAPTERS🌺 ~ @00:00 Intro~Holy Oil of YHVH as detailed in Exodus will be ready to ship this week~Please, if you wish me to send you a bottle send me your name & address via email and Twitter/X (see addresses in “Description” box above). As it is a GIft of G-d & myself, there are NO cutting corners as if it were a product to be sold. It is G-d’s Holy Oil, therefore, it is a GREAT transgression for anyone to sell it. It is made with the finest ingredients & fashioned with the adornments of the Holy Tabernacle, Ark of the Covenant & Hebrew Priests who preside over it. It will be NO labour to me but a GREAT JOY if you desire I create one for you or a loved one. In these times you become ONE with G-d by being the Ark yourself~the vessel which holds Him IS the MOST important of earthly works. @11:31 What is WRONG with Prof. Bart Ehrman? If a lay person like myself picks up on his glaring errors~Why doesn’t he? @31:07 Felina finds fault with Catholic New Testament scholar too! Watch this ~ @36:50 Why we are able to trust the early Christian Church Fathers to have gathered, confirmed & recorded the Life, Teachings, & Mission of Christ accurately? @49:50 Catholic Answers’ Fr. Charles Grondin answers a question regarding the LE of Mark ~ @52:53 Crazee Scholar Snapp! James Snapp presents his meticulous research, detailing codices, New Testament ch, verses, & even a video too! G-D Bless him for ALL his fine work ~ @56:10 “The Case Against The Longer Ending of Mark by Peter M. Head, PhD of The Text & Cannon Institute presents a thoroughly researched, finely detailed, fully cited take on the LE of Mark. Here he illustrates his shared views with James Snapp (previously cited), and more importantly, where Mr. Snapp’s case falls short, or is obliterated by the preponderance of evidence against the LE(16:9-20), and towards the SE (16:8). A well done job worth the expounding of your intellect on this and any Biblical matter. @1:35:53 “Which Ending of Mark’s is Correct” by Sean Nelson ~ The MOST thoroughly detailed of all research I have come upon so far, here he outlines the many internal & external factors which make an ancient codex/manuscript reliable, where the LE is NOT, including fully cited sources, comparisons not to the “other” Gospels where scholars believe the LE was pulled out of, but from the 1st part of Mark’s own words. I find that ALL sources have something important to add to the discussion. Forgoing any for the sake of time ~ I warn, you WILL miss out on the GREATEST understanding of this matter ~ @2:07:00 Why am I happy to find the longer ending IS NOT original? (See Matthew 25:36-40) @2:17:00 Citing my sources, for the belief known in my own heart regarding the addition of a certain verse to be in fact an “addition” and NOT the words of the Living Christ, I had confirmed by the following teachings. The Words of Our Saviour & Eternal Lord ~ Matthew 25:32, Luke 10:29-37, Matthew 7:1-3, Matthew 6:3, Matthew 25:35-40, Matthew 7:21 ~ If you disagree, PLEASE tell me in the comments. Thank & God Bless You for taking the time to listen!🌺 Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/6091222205071360