×

netlethe's video: Blood on Their Hands

@Blood on Their Hands
Blood on Their Hands Michael Hudson, a research professor of Economics at University of Missouri, Kansas City and a research associate at the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Financial crashes were well understood for a hundred years after they became a normal financial phenomenon in the mid-19th century. Much like the buildup of plaque deposits in human veins and arteries, an accumulation of debt gained momentum exponentially until the economy crashed, wiping out bad debts -- along with savings on the other side of the balance sheet. Physical property remained intact, although much was transferred from debtors to creditors. But clearing away the debt overhead from the economy's circulatory system freed it to resume its upswing. That was the positive role of crashes: They minimized the cost of debt service, bringing prices and income back in line with actual "real" costs of production. Debt claims were replaced by equity ownership. Housing prices were lower -- and more affordable, being brought back in line with their actual rental value. Goods and services no longer had to incorporate the debt charges that the financial upswing had built into the system. Financial crashes came suddenly. They often were triggered by a crop failure causing farmers to default, or "the autumnal drain" drew down bank liquidity when funds were needed to move the crops. Crashes often also revealed large financial fraud and "excesses." This was not really a "cycle." It was a scallop-shaped a ratchet pattern: an ascending curve, ending in a vertical plunge. But popular terminology called it a cycle because the pattern was similar again and again, every eleven years or so. When loans by banks and debt claims by other creditors could not be paid, they were wiped out in a convulsion of bankruptcy. Gradually, as the financial system became more "elastic," each business recovery started from a larger debt overhead relative to output. The United States emerged from World War II relatively debt free. Downturns occurred, crashes wiped out debts and savings, but each recovery since 1945 has taken place with a higher debt overhead. Bank loans and bonds have replaced stocks, as more stocks have been retired in leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and buyback plans (to keep stock prices high and thus give more munificent rewards to managers via the stock options they give themselves) than are being issued to raise new equity capital. But after the stock market's dot.com crash of 2000 and the Federal Reserve flooding the U.S. economy with credit after 9/11, 2001, there was so much "free spending money" that many economists believed that the era of scientific money management had arrived and the financial cycle had ended. Growth could occur smoothly -- with no over-optimism as to debt, no inability to pay, no proliferation of over-valuation or fraud. This was the era in which Alan Greenspan was applauded as Maestro for ostensibly creating a risk-free environment by removing government regulators from the financial oversight agencies. What has made the post-2008 crash most remarkable is not merely the delusion that the way to get rich is by debt leverage (unless you are a banker, that is). Most unique is the crash's aftermath. This time around the bad debts have not been wiped off the books. There have indeed been the usual bankruptcies -- but the bad lenders and speculators are being saved from loss by the government intervening to issue Treasury bonds to pay them off out of future tax revenues or new money creation. The Obama Administration's Wall Street managers have kept the debt overhead in place -- toxic mortgage debt, junk bonds, and most seriously, the novel web of collateralized debt obligations (CDO), credit default swaps (almost monopolized by A.I.G.) and kindred financial derivatives .. Read More at: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/ http://www.rt.com http://www.maxkeiser.com

7

8
netlethe
Subscribers
4.4K
Total Post
156
Total Views
669.9K
Avg. Views
13.4K
View Profile
This video was published on 2012-04-05 23:09:27 GMT by @netlethe on Youtube. netlethe has total 4.4K subscribers on Youtube and has a total of 156 video.This video has received 7 Likes which are lower than the average likes that netlethe gets . @netlethe receives an average views of 13.4K per video on Youtube.This video has received 8 comments which are lower than the average comments that netlethe gets . Overall the views for this video was lower than the average for the profile.

Other post by @netlethe