nibirushock's video: MH17: Donetsk Eyewitnesses saw Military Aircraft attack Dutch Report reveals: it broke up in air

Dutch report says MH17 broke up in air after being hit by ‘high-energy objects’ ►http://www.brianbrown.net/2014/09/09/dutch-report-says-mh17-broke-up-in-air-after-being-hit-by-high-energy-objects/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+brianbrown+%28Brian+Brown+-+Fighting+Corruption+and+the+New+World+Order...+One+feed+at+a+time!%29 ROME — The Dutch Safety Board released its preliminary report on the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Tuesday, saying the Boeing 777 broke up in the air as a result of structural damage caused by “a large number of high-energy objects” that penetrated it. Link to Preliminary Report of Dutch Safety Board (09/09/2014): ►http://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/uploads/phase-docs/701/b3923acad0ceprem-rapport-mh-17-en-interactief.pdf "A number of parts have been found near bodies, those of the crew in particular, a number of metal objects which we are now investigating,” said Tjibbe Joustra, Chairman of the Dutch Safety Board. ►https://ca.news.yahoo.com/video/malaysia-seeks-justice-dutch-report-114409299.html ►https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDk9xF6d7yI US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft ►http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/08/07/374410/fighter-jet-shot-down-mh17-us-experts/ The eyewitness accounts are perfectly congruent with the ATC transcript. Eyewitnesses report explosions in the air when the plane made a sharp turn around and changed its trajectory, after which it fell apart. The ATC transcript in the Dutch research report confirm that Dnipropetrovs’k ATC (Dnipro Radar) instructed the pilot to immediately change its course to Rostov to the RND point in order to return the MH17 back to waypoint TIKNA, after passing RND. The pilot confirmed the instruction which was also his last broadcast at exactly 13.19.56 hours. After this time there was no communication and it disappeared from primary radar. The big question of extreme importance remains: what was this military aircraft that the eyewitnesses saw, doing there? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No BBC Video Removal Scandal After All; Evidence of Military Planes Shadowing MH17 Mounts ►http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/07/no-bbc-video-removal-scandal-afterall.html .99 On July 23 the BBC deleted a video report from correspondent Olga Ivishina regarding the crash of MH17. This has caused quite a stir in the blogosphere because the deleted video contained eyewitness reports of military aircraft flying on the same day, shadowing MH17. I found dozens of references to the removal, but to find BBC's reason for removing the video, I had to search the BBC website. It's in Russian. Jan Leder, managing editor of Russian BBC Service explains Why Bi-bi-si Material Removed From Site. My initial reaction was that Leder's response was disingenuous. However, the BBC has since re-posted the video. Reader Jacob Dreizin, a US citizen who speaks Russian and reads Ukrainian, went over the original and now re-posted videos and it appears the BBC was telling the truth all along. Although it's not entirely clear, the managing editor says that the intent from the get-go was to fix the material and put it back up as soon as possible. I have reviewed the original version side-by-side with the new one. And I can see what she's talking about. The new video still has all the eyewitness ladies that everyone has focused on. The new video removed a somewhat irrelevant lecture from the VItalii Naida, the Ukrainian counterintelligence chief. Instead, it has a Ukrainian official claiming that no combat flights take place over rebel areas, followed by a local resident making a mockery of that claim. It also has a segment where a BBC aviation expert is quoted as giving his rebuttal to a rebel's claim that Ukrainian warplanes have used civilian flights as cover. The expert says that while he can't rule it out, it seems very unlikely to him, for various technical reasons. However, I don't think he quite understands precisely what the interviewees are saying. All in all, there's no BBC scandal here. But if you just want to focus strictly on what the eyewitness ladies said I've improved it a bit. Here goes... Eyewitness : There were two explosions in the air. This is how it [the plane] tore apart. And it [the remains of the plane] flew off to the sides [gesturing with hands in two opposite directions]. Eyewitness : And nearby there was one other airplane, a military one, everyone saw. Eyewitness : Yes, yes. It was going lower, because it could be seen. It was going below the passenger plane. Eyewitness : There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. Then this plane turned around sharply like this [gesturing with her finger], changed trajectory, and flew in that direction [showing the direction with her hand].