×

truebras's video: Running Trix 25027 DR Br 02 0314 Roco Br02 0201 in Excursion Style Marklin 39027 Roco 63198

@Running Trix 25027 DR Br 02.0314 & Roco Br02 0201 in Excursion Style. (Marklin 39027, Roco 63198)
A plausible video of what could be an excursion run with models of DR Br 02.0314 and Br 02.0201 steam locomotives running in parallel tracks if the former prototype would be in working order. Both are high speed brake test locomotives that were one of kind rebuilt around 1960 in the DDR. Inspired on videos of parallel track runs in Geislinger grade in Germany and when UP FEF 844 ran together with SP GS4 4449. The Br 02.0314 is a Trix 25027 (Marklin 39027) just recently released. Not going into specifics, I am pleased surprised. It is natural that Marklin had to step up details of this model, because Roco's Br 02.0201 it is one of best models in their line. I can see improvements on diecast boiler and tender parts, as well as in the plastic details. I like to see that pilot and trailing trucks now show rivets on. There is even plastic detail of linkage of inner cylinders, although in black plastic. It is a great model and priced right considering extra lighting and the dynamic smoke unit. One criticism is that for Trix models. They still come with 2mm deep "pizza cutter" flange on wheels. it looks so non prototypical and very toyish. How many of us ran this models on Trix International track. C'mon Marklin, times have changed. Make models that can run on popular Code 100 NMRA tracks.

81

9
truebras
Subscribers
3.9K
Total Post
190
Total Views
500.1K
Avg. Views
7K
View Profile
This video was published on 2021-11-20 15:18:12 GMT by @truebras on Youtube. truebras has total 3.9K subscribers on Youtube and has a total of 190 video.This video has received 81 Likes which are higher than the average likes that truebras gets . @truebras receives an average views of 7K per video on Youtube.This video has received 9 comments which are higher than the average comments that truebras gets . Overall the views for this video was lower than the average for the profile.

Other post by @truebras